Sunday, September 13, 2009
13 Sep
This week I think I would like to say a little bit about the emergence of mass politics and the resurgence of desire for democracy among the majority of Germans, and of course abroad as well at the time. There has always been debate about if democracy is truly the best method of governance. This is a worthy debate. It has been said that the majority should have the final say, regardless of what they personally have invested in their government. This became a big desire for Germans, and they were optimistic that they were beginning to taste what it was like to have a constitutional system as well as being able to choose who would represent them in their government, not just by due aristocratic right. At the same time, the traditionally aristocratic ruling class was very anxious of the system as they saw the weak parts of the system; namely, the fact that the voting pool is essentially the mob. History teaches us that "mob rule" very often is focused chaos and used for extreme measures. The traditional ruling class was worried that any common Joe could run for an office and capture an election by recognition and not particularly merit. This is the fundamental danger democracy and mass politics inevitably brings to the table. However, it was very interesting how the new constitutional state in Germany was able to withstand the two opposing forces and basically keep society on an even keel and proves the risiliency of the system, especially in the rapidly developing industrial economy as well as in collapse as was seen in the mid 1870's as Germany was poised to be the industial powerhouse in Europe.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
you make an excellent point about the aristocracy;s (maybe the educated elites) fears about giving final say to the voters. Indeed, it is almost like giving into mob rule. Yes democracy is fair, but is total democracy a realistic goal. yes it is a nice and fair idea. but is it a smart idea to give big impact decision to an uneducated majority?
ReplyDeleteI definitely see why the aristocracy would be scared of pure democracy under majority rule. However, if these people truly knew how to lead the German state and things were good would they have anything to fear? People usually do not drive chaos when food is in their belly and they are relatively happy. To me it seems a deficiency of the aristocracy and not the people.
ReplyDeleteA great post and responses. Mass democracy was quite a challenge to Modern Germany, one of the many threats posed by modernity, and political parties had trouble coming to terms with it. Liberals especially feared allowing those with education or property (no 'stake' in society) participate in politics since they constituted the uneducated 'mob'. The irony of much democracy is exactly what Taylor argues: most people are only politically active when they are truly unhappy with their living conditions. Even in modern democracies, most people are shockingly politically apathetic unless motivated by a particular issue that touches their lives. And I think the debate rages today even in out modern parties about the 'average' voter and whether or not he/she can make 'educated' decisions. (Interesting how both parties claim to represent the 'people' and yet seem to have a very troubled relationship with those same people.)
ReplyDelete